Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Culturally Christian or Biblical Christian?

Over the past year as a nation we have seen a huge spike in the debate over marriage. It occurred to me some time ago when masses of people plastered their Facebook, twitter, and Instagram with pictures of the infamous = sign. For those of you who are unaware of the meaning of this sign, it was the HRC invention to get people to "paint the town red" with their = sign, in support of gay rights marriage. While the sheer number of people who partook in this campaign on social media shocked me. What really shocked me was "who" posted it in support. These so called supporters of the HRC campaign were also people who claimed Christianity as their worldview of "choice".


Before I continue, I want to make something incredible clear. I am by no means any better, or less in need of a savior than any person who adheres to homosexual activities. In fact, homosexual behavior is not some greater sin, but rather a sin resulting from a greater condition. This condition entered the world through Adam and Eve. God did not create sin, but rather created Adam and Eve with the potential to fall. And ultimately as a result of Adam and Eve's fall, sin entered the world, and in all creeping things that creep. So, just to be clear, I hold my homosexual friends to the same standard I hold myself to... because we both suffer from this condition of sin. We are not called to treat our homosexual friends any different than our non homosexual friends. But, that does not exclude them either, from being called into Church discipline. Matthew 18:15 "If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother" the goal of this is to bring your brother or sisters sin to restoration.


The bible clearly teaches from beginning to end that marriage is between a man and a woman.


Genesis 2:18 Then the Lord God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him." 2:19 Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 2:20 The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. 2:21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 2:22 The Lord God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. 2:23 The man said, "This is now bone of my bones, And flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, Because she was taken out of Man." 2:24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh. 2:25 And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.


So, why have so many people who claim Christianity to be true insist on siding with culture. Ravi Zacharias said it this way, "I have little doubt that the single greatest obstacle to the impact of the gospel has not been its inability to provide answers, but the failure on our part to live it out." The Church has become complacent on ideas that are counter cultural. To the Christian, the bible should be his or her ultimate authority. But if you ask the common church goer today to give a brief overview of what it means to be a Christ follower, and be prepared to be shocked about how little they seem to know. A couple of days ago, I had the privilege of reading Martin Luther King's letter which he addressed to his clergymen while he was imprisoned in Birmingham. I was in tears at points when he talks about the complacency of the church.


Here is a brief look at what he had to say, "Yes, these questions are still in my mind. In deep disappointment I have wept over the laxity of the church. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love. There can be no deep disappointment where there is not deep love. Yes, I love the church. How could I do otherwise? I am in the rather unique position of being the son, the grandson and the great grandson of preachers. Yes, I see the church as the body of Christ. But, oh! How we have blemished and scarred that body through social neglect and through fear of being nonconformists.
There was a time when the church was very powerful--in the time when the early Christians rejoiced at being deemed worthy to suffer for what they believed. In those days the church was not merely a thermometer that recorded the ideas and principles of popular opinion; it was a thermostat that transformed the mores of society. Whenever the early Christians entered a town, the people in power became disturbed and immediately sought to convict the Christians for being "disturbers of the peace" and "outside agitators."' But the Christians pressed on, in the conviction that they were "a colony of heaven," called to obey God rather than man. Small in number, they were big in commitment. They were too God-intoxicated to be "astronomically intimidated." By their effort and example they brought an end to such ancient evils as infanticide and gladiatorial contests. Things are different now. So often the contemporary church is a weak, ineffectual voice with an uncertain sound. So often it is an archdefender of the status quo. Far from being disturbed by the presence of the church, the power structure of the average community is consoled by the church's silent--and often even vocal--sanction of things as they are.

But the judgment of God is upon the church as never before. If today's church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century. Every day I meet young people whose disappointment with the church has turned into outright disgust."


Have we become a "irrelevant social club with no meaning"? As a Christ follower my plea to anyone who claims Christianity is pick up your bible and examine what the spoken word of God says. If we continue to bastardize the truth of the gospel, I'm uncertain that we ever really truly understood it. The reality is that even an atheist, pantheist, buddist, and agnostic can live as a cultural Christian. But, to live under the authority of Gods spoken word,  only a True Christ follower can assert. So as a group of believers we need to be ready to step aside from the culture, and suffer for what the gospel teaches us. Lets stop living as cultural Christians, and start living as biblical Christians. Paul says it best in Philippians 3:7-21




3:7 But whatever things were gain to me, those things I have counted as loss for the sake of Christ. 3:8 More than that, I count all things to be loss in view of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them but rubbish so that I may gain Christ, 3:9 and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith, 3:10 that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death; 3:11 in order that I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.

3:12 Not that I have already obtained it or have already become perfect, but I press on so that I may lay hold of that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus. 3:13 Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet; but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, 3:14 I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. 3:15 Let us therefore, as many as are perfect, have this attitude; and if in anything you have a different attitude, God will reveal that also to you; 3:16 however, let us keep living by that same standard to which we have attained.

3:17 Brethren, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us. 3:18 For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even weeping, that they are enemies of the cross of Christ, 3:19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. 3:20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; 3:21 who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself.




May all glory be to God on High

JD





Sunday, December 15, 2013

Is there room for God in science?

For the past 10 years I've had the privilege of working with high school students through a ministry called Young Life. Young Life is a ministry where leaders build relationships in hope of sharing the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ with them. Through building relationships over the years I have been asked many questions...questions like who is God? where did I come from? who is the author of the Universe? what is my purpose? where did God come from?  Can these forever old questions of origin, meaning, morality, and destiny be explained exclusively by science? There is no question to how successful science has been over the years, and as a result we are seeing more and more people jumping on the new atheist train. Many leading scientists claim that as a result of today's science there is no need for God.  They say it is entirely possible to explain the cosmos if full through science.  There is obvious proof that God is surely misunderstood this day and age, but is new age science and atheism vastly misunderstood as well?  What I find extremely intriguing is the fact of history.  If we take a look back into the 16th and 17th centuries we see that most of the leading scientists were also believers in God. 

How C.S. Lewis viewed this very idea:
"Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in 
Nature because they believed in a Legislator. In most modern scientists this belief has died: it will be 
interesting to see how long their confidence in uniformity survives it. Two significant 
developments have already appeared—the hypothesis of a lawless sub-nature, and the surrender of the 
claim that science is true. We may be living nearer than we suppose to the end of the Scientific Age."

Today, we are taught that through science we can explain the universe. We can understand the truth of the universe by understanding the principles that science teaches us.  This unfortunate misunderstanding is so vast among people today.  For instance we are told that science explains what gravity, time, and energy are.  But if you begin to unpack this statement it's so clearly false.  Science doesn't actually know what gravity, time and energy are. Many of these new atheists believe that God limits science, but does it? Can science explain what to do when we see a person drowning in a river? No, but God can. Can science explain what is deserved of a child rapist? No, but God can. So in the realm of ultimate reality which stance limits our understanding of the universe? Which view is the reductionist view? I would argue that the full potential of science can only be understood from the biblical perspective of the God of the Bible.  For instance when we ask the atheist if science can explain what preceded space, time, energy, and matter...they respond well science can't explain that yet. And usually in response they ask the question, "Well if God created the universe what created this God?" they deduce that because God exists something had to create God, and  therefore its nonsense...God cannot exist. Now, lets take a deeper look at this.  What they assume by asking the question "what or who created the creator"...is that the creator must be created.  To almost all religions in the world this question would stump them...but to the God of the bible this question does not apply because He is an UN-created creator. As John puts it in John 1:1-3 "all things were made through him, and without him not anything was made." This implies that all things were made by God and without Him nothing was made...therefore making Him a God with no beginning. In other words if God is responsible for all things being made...and nothing that came into being was made without God, the deduction is that God could never come to be...and if God is and could never come to be, He must have always been with no beginning. So as we look back at the questions asked through the view of the Christian world view, the question isn't who created the creator because the God of the bible was never created...but to the atheistic worldview the question of what preceded is reduced to I don't know.  You see a world view that says science can answer all the questions...therefore there is no room for God is actually a very reductionist world view. While a world view that says science through the realm of the Christian God is actually magnified. 

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.(John 1:1-3, ESV)